Revision 2

Accepted · core change · record

Changes against revision 1:

Title: Is a separate four-body parameter needed for Efimov-linked tetramers?
Plain: Four atoms can also bind into states attached to each Efimov molecule. The question is whether their positions follow from the three-atom number alone, or need extra information.
Precise · changed · core: Revision 1: Zero-range theory predicts tetramer loss resonances at a_4,1 ~ 0.43 a_- and a_4,2 ~ 0.90 a_- (von Stecher, D'Incao, Greene 2009). With realistic van der Waals interactions, determine whether these ratios are universal to 5% or depend on short-range four-body physics. Answer: yes or no with a computed and measured spread across species.; Revision 2: Zero-range theory predicts tetramer loss resonances at $a_{4},1 \sim 0.43 a_{-}$ and $a_{4},2 \sim 0.90 a_{-}$ (von Stecher, D'Incao, Greene 2009). With realistic van der Waals interactions, determine whether these ratios are universal to 5% or depend on short-range four-body physics. Answer: yes or no with a computed and measured spread across species.
Settled by: Precision four-body loss spectroscopy in several species with a matching van der Waals four-body calculation.
Kind: well-posed
Answer type: yes-no
References: (empty)
Literature status: partially-resolved
Status note: Cesium experiments since 2009 roughly match the zero-range ratios, but precision tests across species are missing.
Posed since: 2009

Decisions