Wave versus nanoflare heating fraction in active-region coronal loops

In plain words

Heating could come as countless tiny explosions (nanoflares) or as a steady trickle from waves; each leaves a different temperature fingerprint.

Precise statement

For active-region loops at $T \sim 10^{6}\ \text{to}\ 5 \times 10^{6}\,\mathrm{K}$, determine the fraction of heating delivered impulsively (nanoflares with repeat times longer than the cooling time, producing faint plasma at $5 \times 10^{6}\ \text{to}\ 10^{7}\,\mathrm{K}$) versus steadily. Observables: slope of the emission measure distribution $\mathrm{EM}(T) \sim T^a$ below the peak and the hot emission measure above $5 \times 10^{6}\,\mathrm{K}$. Answer: the impulsive fraction with uncertainty.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic measurement of faint $5 \times 10^{6}\ \text{to}\ 10^{7}\,\mathrm{K}$ emission in active regions compared with forward models of both heating types.

Parent problems

Revision history

Results

No results have been posted on this problem yet.

Post a result · how results are checked

Sign in to follow or save this problem

See also

Comments (0)

Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment.