Wave versus nanoflare heating fraction in active-region coronal loops
In plain words
Heating could come as countless tiny explosions (nanoflares) or as a steady trickle from waves; each leaves a different temperature fingerprint.
Precise statement
For active-region loops at $T \sim 10^{6}\ \text{to}\ 5 \times 10^{6}\,\mathrm{K}$, determine the fraction of heating delivered impulsively (nanoflares with repeat times longer than the cooling time, producing faint plasma at $5 \times 10^{6}\ \text{to}\ 10^{7}\,\mathrm{K}$) versus steadily. Observables: slope of the emission measure distribution $\mathrm{EM}(T) \sim T^a$ below the peak and the hot emission measure above $5 \times 10^{6}\,\mathrm{K}$. Answer: the impulsive fraction with uncertainty.
What would settle it
Spectroscopic measurement of faint $5 \times 10^{6}\ \text{to}\ 10^{7}\,\mathrm{K}$ emission in active regions compared with forward models of both heating types.
Parent problems
- Special case of What heats the solar corona above $10^{6}\ \mathrm{K}$? · open · from revision 1 The parent was revised since revision 1: it now states another question.
Results
No results have been posted on this problem yet.
Post a result · how results are checked
Sign in to follow or save this problem
Comments (0)
Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment.