Origin of the steep power-law scaling of breakdown rate
In plain words
The chance of a spark per pulse grows roughly as the 30th power of the field and the 5th power of the pulse length; this empirical rule has no derivation.
Precise statement
Measured breakdown rate per pulse per unit length in conditioned Cu structures follows $\mathrm{BDR} \sim E^{n} \tau_{p}^{m}$ with n approximately 30 and m approximately 5 (CLIC test-stand data), and BDR at fixed field decreases slowly with accumulated pulse number (conditioning). Derive n, m and the conditioning curve from a microscopic model, and state whether the power law persists at BDR below $10^{-7}$ per pulse per meter of structure.
What would settle it
A model whose predicted n, m and conditioning curve match test-stand data at two or more frequencies without refitting.
Parent problems
- Special case of Microscopic mechanism that initiates vacuum RF breakdown on copper · open · from revision 1
Problems built on this one
Special cases
Results
No results have been posted on this problem yet.
Post a result · how results are checked
Sign in to follow or save this problem
Comments (0)
Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment.