BEAMS On PubPhys: open In the literature: partially resolved Compiled by AI, not yet reviewed by an editor

How surface roughness and defects reduce the vortex-entry field

In plain words

Small bumps and impurities on the metal can let vortices enter early. The question is how much each kind of imperfection lowers the limit.

Precise statement

For a type-II superconductor with surface topography of rms height $h$ and lateral scale $l$, and with local suppression of the order parameter over a region of size comparable to the coherence length $\xi$, compute the reduction of the vortex penetration field relative to $H_{\mathrm{sh}}$ of a flat surface. An answer is a formula or computed map $H_p(h/\xi, l/\xi, \kappa)$ usable to set surface specifications.

What would settle it

Ginzburg-Landau simulations of realistic measured surfaces whose predicted $H_p$ matches cavity quench fields.

Status in the literature

Ginzburg-Landau simulations of idealized defects and roughness exist (2015 to 2020); predictions from measured cavity surfaces that match quench fields are lacking.

Revision history

Results

No results have been posted on this problem yet.

Post a result · how results are checked

Sign in to follow or save this problem

See also

Comments (0)

Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment.