Why E. coli encodes far less information than molecule counting allows
This text mentions work from 2024 on. Those parts were partly written without a live literature search and have not been checked by an editor yet.
In plain words
The gut bacterium E. coli swims toward food by sensing chemical gradients, and it climbs them nearly as fast as the information it collects allows. Yet it collects about a hundred times less information than the random arrival of molecules at its receptors would permit, and the source of this loss is unknown.
Precise statement
For E. coli in shallow gradients of methyl-aspartate, the measured information rate from ligand input to chemotaxis signaling (kinase) activity is about $10^{-2}$ of the molecule-arrival (Berg-Purcell type) limit, while drift speed is near the bound set by the measured information rate (Mattingly and co-workers, 2021 and 2026). Identify which internal noise source (receptor-cluster switching, CheR/CheB methylation noise, CheY phosphorylation noise) sets the information rate, and whether it reflects a physical constraint or a trade-off; an answer is a quantitative noise budget that reproduces the measured information rate.
What would settle it
Single-cell measurements of each candidate noise source and of the information rate in the same strains, with a model that closes the information budget and predicts the effect of mutations that change each source.
Status in the literature
Unverified note: it names recent work and was partly written without a live literature search; it awaits a check by an editor.
Single-cell measurements in 2026 placed E. coli two orders of magnitude below the molecule-arrival limit and attributed the loss to internal signaling noise (Nature Physics, doi 10.1038/s41567-025-03111-4); the dominant source is not identified.
Results
No results have been posted on this problem yet.
Post a result · how results are checked
Sign in to follow or save this problem
Comments (0)
Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment.