Does a growing static length control relaxation near $T_g$?
In plain words
Near the glass point, molecules rearrange in cooperating groups whose size grows on cooling. It is unknown whether a growing structural length that ordinary structure measurements cannot see controls how slow the liquid becomes.
Precise statement
Determine whether the point-to-set length $\xi_{\mathrm{PTS}}(T)$ (radius of a cavity, with frozen particles outside it, beyond which the interior forgets the frozen boundary) and the dynamic heterogeneity length $\xi_4(T)$ (from the four-point susceptibility $\chi_4$) are linked to the relaxation time by $\tau_{\alpha} \sim \tau_0 \exp(c \xi^{\psi} / T)$ with a single exponent psi over the range from the onset temperature to $T_g$. An answer gives $\xi_{\mathrm{PTS}}(T)$, $\xi_4(T)$ and $\tau_{\alpha}(T)$ from equilibrium simulations below the experimental $T_g$ and either confirms the relation with a measured $\psi$ or refutes it.
What would settle it
Equilibrium measurements of $\xi_{\mathrm{PTS}}$, $\xi_4$ and $\tau_\alpha$ over enough decades of $\tau_\alpha$ to fix $\psi$ with error bars, or to show that no single relation holds.
Status in the literature
Unverified note: it names recent work and was partly written without a live literature search; it awaits a check by an editor.
Simulations to date reach point-to-set lengths of only a few particle diameters, so $\psi$ is poorly constrained (2026).
Parent problems
- Special case of What causes the super-Arrhenius slowdown of supercooled liquids? · open · from revision 1 The parent was revised since revision 1: it now states another question.
Results
No results have been posted on this problem yet.
Post a result · how results are checked
Sign in to follow or save this problem
Comments (0)
Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment.