BIO On PubPhys: open In the literature: partially resolved Compiled by AI, not yet reviewed by an editor

Are jamming exponents mean-field already in two and three dimensions?

In plain words

Theory solved exactly in infinitely many dimensions predicts specific numbers for how contacts and forces behave at the jamming point. Simulations find the same numbers in two and three dimensions, and nobody has shown why.

Precise statement

For frictionless soft spheres at the jamming density $\phi_J$, the infinite-dimensional theory predicts the gap distribution g(h) ~ h^(-gamma) with $\gamma = 0.41269$ and the small-force distribution P(f) ~ f^theta_e with $\theta_e = 0.42311$ for extended contacts, and excess coordination $\Delta Z \sim (\phi - \phi_J)^{(1/2)}$. Simulations agree with these values in $d = 2 \text{ and } 3$, suggesting an upper critical dimension $d_u = 2$. An answer is a controlled argument (renormalization group or rigorous) fixing d_u and computing any corrections in $d = 2, 3$.

What would settle it

A field-theoretic or rigorous derivation of $d_{u}$ for jamming, confirmed by high-precision finite-size scaling of $\gamma$ and $\theta_{e}$ in $d = 2\ \text{and}\ 3$.

Status in the literature

Unverified note: it names recent work and was partly written without a live literature search; it awaits a check by an editor.

Numerics agree with mean-field exponents in $d = 2, 3$, but no theory establishes the upper critical dimension (2026).

Revision history

Results

No results have been posted on this problem yet.

Post a result · how results are checked

Sign in to follow or save this problem

See also

Comments (0)

Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment.