Sustained exponential self-replication by a polymerase ribozyme
This text mentions work from 2024 on. Those parts were partly written without a live literature search and have not been checked by an editor yet.
In plain words
In the RNA-world idea, early life used RNA both as genes and as enzymes, which requires an RNA able to copy itself. In 2026 a 45-nucleotide RNA enzyme copied itself and its partner strand, but too slowly and too inaccurately for its numbers to keep growing over many rounds.
Precise statement
A polymerase ribozyme of length $L$ must synthesize complete copies of itself and of its complementary strand with per-nucleotide fidelity $q$ satisfying $L(1 - q) < \ln(\sigma)$ (Eigen error threshold; $\sigma$ = selective advantage of the correct sequence), at yields that allow exponential growth over repeated cycles that include strand separation. QT45, a 45-nucleotide ribozyme (Gianni and co-workers, Science 2026), synthesizes its complementary strand from a random triplet pool at $q = 0.941$ and a copy of itself from defined triplet substrates, each at about 0.2% yield in 72 days in eutectic ice. Answer: yes or no, with a demonstrated system showing sustained exponential amplification of both strands over many rounds without defined oligomer feeds.
What would settle it
Demonstration of sustained exponential amplification of a ribozyme by its own copying activity over many rounds, with sequence fidelity measured by deep sequencing.
Status in the literature
Unverified note: it names recent work and was partly written without a live literature search; it awaits a check by an editor.
In 2026 the 45-nucleotide ribozyme QT45 synthesized its complementary strand ($94.1\%$ fidelity) and a copy of itself at about $0.2\%$ yield in $72\,\mathrm{days}$; sustained self-replication has not been reported (Science, doi 10.1126/science.adt2760).
Parent problems
- Special case of How chemistry produced the first evolving replicator · open · from revision 1
Results
No results have been posted on this problem yet.
Post a result · how results are checked
Sign in to follow or save this problem
Comments (0)
Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment.