CM On PubPhys: open In the literature: partially resolved Compiled by AI, not yet reviewed by an editor

Does the charge-transfer gap set the maximum $T_{c}$ across cuprate families?

In plain words

The energy needed to move an electron from oxygen to copper, the charge-transfer gap, differs between cuprate families; superexchange theories predict that a smaller gap gives stronger pairing and a higher transition temperature.

Precise statement

For hole-doped cuprates at optimal doping, test whether $T_c,\mathrm{max}$ and the zero-temperature pair density decrease monotonically with the charge-transfer energy $\Delta_{\mathrm{CT}}$ (equivalently increase with $J\sim t_{\mathrm{pd}}^4/\Delta_{\mathrm{CT}}^3$), as superexchange pairing in the three-band Emery model predicts. An answer is a cross-family data set ($\Delta_{\mathrm{CT}}$ from optics or tunneling, $T_c,\mathrm{max}$, superfluid density) with a quantitative fit to model predictions, or a counterexample family.

What would settle it

Measurement of $\Delta_{\mathrm{CT}}$ and the pair or superfluid density in at least five cuprate families, compared with three-band model calculations of $T_{c}$ versus $\Delta_{\mathrm{CT}}$.

Status in the literature

Scanning tunneling spectroscopy on Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x (2022) found that the local pair density anticorrelates with the local charge-transfer gap; a cross-family quantitative test is incomplete.

Parent problems

Revision history

Results

No results have been posted on this problem yet.

Post a result · how results are checked

Sign in to follow or save this problem

Comments (0)

Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment.