CM On PubPhys: open In the literature: partially resolved Compiled by AI, not yet reviewed by an editor

Origin of the low-temperature saturation of the electron dephasing time

In plain words

Collisions between electrons predict a phase-coherence time that keeps growing on cooling, but many wires and films show it leveling off. Whether trace magnetic impurities explain every such case, or some other source remains, is open.

Precise statement

In quasi-$1\mathrm{D}$ disordered metal wires, electron-electron interaction gives $\tau_{\phi}\sim T^{-2/3}$ (Altshuler, Aronov and Khmelnitsky). Mohanty, Jariwala and Webb (1997) reported saturation of $\tau_{\phi}$ at low $T$ in Au wires and proposed an intrinsic mechanism; Pierre et al. (2003) found the interaction prediction obeyed in the purest Ag wires and traced saturation in other wires to magnetic impurities at the part-per-million level. Determine whether all reported saturation, including disordered alloy films, oxide films and $2\mathrm{D}$ semiconductor systems, is accounted for by magnetic impurities, radiation heating or other extrinsic sources, or whether a residual saturation remains once these are excluded.

What would settle it

$\tau_{\phi}$ measured well below $0.1\,\mathrm{K}$ in films and wires whose magnetic-impurity content is measured independently and whose electron temperature is fixed by noise thermometry, showing whether any saturation survives.

Status in the literature

Magnetic impurities at part-per-million levels account for saturation in Au and Ag wires (Pierre et al., Physical Review B 68, 085413, 2003); saturation in strongly disordered alloy and oxide films has no agreed source.

Problems built on this one

Special cases

Revision history

Results

No results have been posted on this problem yet.

Post a result · how results are checked

Sign in to follow or save this problem

Comments (0)

Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment.