Is the gap of $\mathrm{Ta_2NiSe_5}$ excitonic or lattice driven?

In plain words

$\mathrm{Ta_2NiSe_5}$ becomes insulating below about 326 K, and at the same temperature its crystal distorts slightly. It is unclear whether electron-hole attraction or the lattice distortion opens the gap.

Precise statement

$\mathrm{Ta_2NiSe_5}$ has an orthorhombic-to-monoclinic transition at $T_c \sim 326\,\mathrm{K}$ with valence-band flattening and a gap of order 0.1 eV seen in photoemission; the excitonic and structural order parameters have the same symmetry and so coexist. Determine which instability drives the transition, i.e. whether a purely electronic (excitonic) susceptibility diverges at $T_c$ with the lattice frozen, or whether the cooperative zone-center phonon distortion is primary, and what fraction of the low-temperature gap each produces. An answer is an identified primary order parameter with a quantitative partition of the gap.

What would settle it

Observation or exclusion of a soft electronic collective mode at $T_{c}$ by Raman or resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, combined with a frozen-lattice many-body computation of the electronic susceptibility.

Status in the literature

Unverified note: it names recent work and was partly written without a live literature search; it awaits a check by an editor.

Raman, photoemission and resonant x-ray studies published through 2025 still support both a dominant excitonic and a dominant structural instability.

Revision history

Results

No results have been posted on this problem yet.

Post a result · how results are checked

Sign in to follow or save this problem

See also

Comments (0)

Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment.