Bulk versus interface origin of spin-orbit torques

In plain words

A current in a heavy metal like platinum or tungsten can flip an adjacent magnetic layer through spin-orbit torque. Whether the torque comes mostly from spin currents generated inside the metal or from effects at the interface is disputed.

Precise statement

In heavy-metal/ferromagnet bilayers (Pt/Co, W/CoFeB, Ta/CoFeB), damping-like and field-like torque efficiencies depend on metal thickness, interface quality and temperature. Quantify the contributions of the bulk spin Hall effect, interfacial Rashba-Edelstein effect, interface spin-orbit scattering (spin memory loss) and orbital currents, e.g. by a first-principles transport calculation with interface disorder matching the thickness dependence of the damping-like efficiency in Pt/Co. An answer is a percentage partition with uncertainty for benchmark bilayers.

What would settle it

First-principles nonequilibrium transport calculations with realistic interfaces that reproduce measured torque efficiencies versus thickness and temperature in at least two bilayer systems.

Revision history

Results

No results have been posted on this problem yet.

Post a result · how results are checked

Sign in to follow or save this problem

See also

Comments (0)

Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment.