FLUID On PubPhys: open In the literature: partially resolved Compiled by AI, not yet reviewed by an editor

Which collapse load, liquid jet or shock wave, causes cavitation erosion?

In plain words

A bubble collapsing next to a metal surface fires a fast liquid jet into it and also sends out shock waves, and repeated collapses pit the metal. Which of these does the damage, and how does that depend on the bubble's distance from the wall?

Precise statement

For a bubble of maximum radius $R_{\max}$ collapsing at stand-off parameter $\gamma = d/R_{\max}$ from a rigid wall, determine the peak wall pressure, its duration and impulse from jet impact (jet speeds $\sim 10^{4}\,\mathrm{cm/s}$ and above) versus the shock emitted at the collapse of the toroidal bubble, as functions of $\gamma$, and which quantity correlates with measured pit formation in metals. An answer is a damage criterion in terms of $\gamma$, $R_{\max}$ and driving pressure that predicts pit depth and occurrence.

What would settle it

Synchronized high-speed imaging, wall-pressure measurement and post-mortem pit analysis on metal targets over a scan of $\gamma$, compared with compressible simulations of the same collapses.

Status in the literature

Unverified note: it names recent work and was partly written without a live literature search; it awaits a check by an editor.

Work over the last decade points to the shock from toroidal collapse at intermediate stand-off and to thin, very fast jets at very small stand-off; no unified damage criterion as of 2026 (not re-verified for 2024-2026).

Revision history

Results

No results have been posted on this problem yet.

Post a result · how results are checked

Sign in to follow or save this problem

Comments (0)

Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment.