GRAV On PubPhys: open In the literature: partially resolved Compiled by AI, not yet reviewed by an editor

Prove the restricted quantum focusing conjecture for semiclassical gravity

This text mentions work from 2024 on. Those parts were partly written without a live literature search and have not been checked by an editor yet.

In plain words

The classical singularity theorems assume energy is never negative, which quantum fields violate. A quantum replacement based on the entropy of the fields plus the area of a surface would restore the theorems, but its original strong form fails in simple models and a weaker form is still a conjecture.

Precise statement

Define the generalized entropy $S_{\mathrm{gen}} = A c^3/(4 G \hbar) + S_{\mathrm{out}}$ of a codimension-2 surface (entropy in units of $k_{\mathrm{B}}$, $S_{\mathrm{out}}$ the entropy of fields outside it) and the quantum expansion $\Theta$ as its variation per unit transverse area along a null congruence with affine parameter $\lambda$. The original quantum focusing conjecture dTheta/dlambda <= 0 (Bousso, Fisher, Leichenauer, Wall 2015) has explicit counterexamples in two-dimensional dilaton gravity coupled to quantum fields (2025); the restricted version requires dTheta/dlambda <= 0 only where $\Theta = 0$ (Shahbazi-Moghaddam 2022). Prove the restricted conjecture for interacting quantum fields coupled to semiclassical gravity in spacetime dimension $d > 2$, or construct a violation.

What would settle it

A proof of restricted quantum focusing in $d > 2$ for interacting fields, or an explicit violating configuration.

Status in the literature

Unverified note: it names recent work and was partly written without a live literature search; it awaits a check by an editor.

Restricted focusing is proved in braneworld models (2022) and in JT gravity coupled to a field theory, where the original conjecture is also shown to fail (Franken, Kaya, Rondeau, Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Tran, arXiv:2510.13961, 2025); the general case in $d>2$ is open as of 2026.

Revision history

Results

No results have been posted on this problem yet.

Post a result · how results are checked

Sign in to follow or save this problem

See also

Comments (0)

Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment.