Why do gallium detectors see about 20 percent fewer neutrino captures?
In plain words
Experiments placing strong radioactive neutrino sources inside gallium consistently record fewer captures than predicted. The cause, new physics or a wrong cross section, is unknown.
Precise statement
The BEST (2022), GALLEX and SAGE source experiments measure $R = \mathrm{observed}/\mathrm{predicted} \sim 0.8$ for Ga-71(nu_e, e-)Ge-71 with Cr-51 and Ar-37 sources, about $4\sigma$ below 1. Determine whether the deficit comes from the capture cross section (Ge-71 excited-state transitions, half-life), the source activity, or oscillation, in tension with reactor and solar limits.
What would settle it
An independent source experiment with a different target and an improved measurement of the Ga-71 to Ge-71 matrix elements and Ge-71 half-life.
Status in the literature
Unverified note: it names recent work and was partly written without a live literature search; it awaits a check by an editor.
Remeasurements of the Ge-71 half-life (2023 to 2024) did not remove the deficit; sterile oscillation explanations conflict with reactor and solar data.
Parent problems
- Special case of What causes the short-baseline neutrino anomalies? · open · from revision 1
Results
No results have been posted on this problem yet.
Post a result · how results are checked
Sign in to follow or save this problem
Comments (0)
Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment.