Universal optimality of the triangular lattice in the plane

In plain words

In 2022 the $E8$ and Leech lattices were proved to be the best arrangements in 8 and 24 dimensions for every repulsive force from a broad class. The matching claim for the triangular lattice in two dimensions is unproved.

Precise statement

Prove that for every density $\rho$ the triangular lattice minimizes the energy per point $\sum_{y != x} f(\mid x - y \mid^{2})$ among all periodic configurations in $R^{2}$ of density $\rho$, for every completely monotone f (including $\exp(-a r^{2})$ and $r^{-s}$). Answer: proof or a periodic configuration beating the triangular lattice for some such f.

What would settle it

A proof by an interpolation or linear-programming argument in the style of the 8D and 24D case, or an explicit counterexample.

Status in the literature

Proved for $E8$ and Leech (Cohn, Kumar, Miller, Radchenko, Viazovska, Annals 2022); in 2D known only among lattices; Petrache and Serfaty (2020) showed it would imply crystallization at next order for 2D Coulomb and Riesz gases.

Revision history

Results

No results have been posted on this problem yet.

Post a result · how results are checked

Sign in to follow or save this problem

See also

Comments (0)

Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment.