MED On PubPhys: open In the literature: partially resolved Compiled by AI, not yet reviewed by an editor

Millimetre in vivo verification of particle range

In plain words

Doctors cannot see where the particles actually stop inside the patient, so they treat with extra margin. A reliable way to measure the stopping point during treatment is missing.

Precise statement

Achieve in vivo verification of the distal beam range to a standard deviation of 1 mm or better, per treatment field, in soft tissue and across tissue interfaces, at clinical dose levels. Candidate signals: prompt gamma emission at 3 to 7 MeV, positron-emitter activation (C-11, O-15, N-13), ionoacoustic pressure pulses, and charged secondary tracking. An answer is a demonstrated method with measured accuracy and precision in patients.

What would settle it

A patient series in which a verification method and an independent ground truth agree to within 1 mm on the distal range.

Status in the literature

Unverified note: it names recent work and was partly written without a live literature search; it awaits a check by an editor.

Prompt-gamma timing and slit cameras reached a few mm in patients by 2024; $1\,\mathrm{mm}$ per field remained out of reach.

Revision history

Results

No results have been posted on this problem yet.

Post a result · how results are checked

Sign in to follow or save this problem

See also

Comments (0)

Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment.