Is the STAR net-proton fluctuation dip a critical-point signal?
This text mentions work from 2024 on. Those parts were partly written without a live literature search and have not been checked by an editor yet.
In plain words
The STAR experiment counted how the number of protons minus antiprotons varies from collision to collision as it lowered the collision energy. In 2025 it reported a dip near one energy, and whether a critical point causes it is unclear.
Precise statement
STAR Beam Energy Scan II (PRL 2025) measured the net-proton cumulant ratio $C4/C2$ in 0-5 percent central $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 7.7 \text{ to } 27 \mathrm{GeV}$ and found a minimum near 19.6 GeV deviating from non-critical baselines by 2 to 5 standard deviations. Determine whether this follows from a critical point, using dynamical models with baryon-number conservation, finite size and lifetime, and non-equilibrium evolution, or from non-critical effects. Answer: yes or no with quantified model uncertainty.
What would settle it
Fixed-target data below $7.7\,\mathrm{GeV}$ (STAR FXT, HADES, CBM at FAIR) testing the predicted energy dependence of $C4/C2$, together with dynamical simulations reproducing the full excitation function.
Status in the literature
Unverified note: it names recent work and was partly written without a live literature search; it awaits a check by an editor.
The significance depends on the choice of non-critical baseline, and no dynamical critical-point model had reproduced the full energy dependence as of 2026.
Parent problems
- Special case of Existence and location of the QCD critical point · open · from revision 1 The parent was revised since revision 1: it now states another question.
Results
No results have been posted on this problem yet.
Post a result · how results are checked
Sign in to follow or save this problem
Comments (0)
Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment.