Can pulsar pair cascades supply the pairs inferred in pulsar wind nebulae?

In plain words

Each charged particle pulled off a pulsar should create many pairs through cascades, and the nebulae around pulsars show how many pairs actually came out. Cascade models may fall short of the number some nebula models need.

Precise statement

Polar-cap cascade models give a maximum pair multiplicity $\kappa = n_{\mathrm{pairs}}/n_{\mathrm{GJ}}$ of a few times $10^{5}$ (Timokhin and Harding 2019), where $n_{\mathrm{GJ}}$ is the Goldreich-Julian charge density, reached for the strongest fields and hottest surfaces in their model grid. Spectral models of the Crab nebula infer $\kappa$ of order $10^{6}$ or more (moderate confidence). Determine whether polar-cap, outer-gap and current-sheet pair production together supply the nebular pair content inferred from radio to gamma-ray spectra, or whether the nebular inference must be revised.

What would settle it

Global kinetic magnetosphere models with QED pair creation giving total pair output, compared with nebula spectral models that constrain the injected pair number.

Revision history

Results

No results have been posted on this problem yet.

Post a result · how results are checked

Sign in to follow or save this problem

See also

Comments (0)

Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment.