Does the Ritus-Narozhny scaling survive in realistic finite-duration fields? · revision history
Revision 2
Accepted · core change · record
Changes against revision 1:
- Title · changed
- Revision 1: Does the Ritus-Narozhny scaling survive in realistic finite-duration fields
- Revision 2: Does the Ritus-Narozhny scaling survive in realistic finite-duration fields?
- Plain
- The predicted breakdown was derived for an idealized field that never switches off, while real laser pulses last a finite time. Calculations for finite pulses find much milder growth of the corrections, so it is unclear whether any real field shows the breakdown.
- Precise · changed · core
- Revision 1: The $(\alpha \chi^{2/3})^n$ loop scaling (Ritus-Narozhny conjecture) holds in an infinite constant crossed field; for finite plane-wave pulses at fixed intensity parameter a0 = e E/(m c omega) and growing particle energy, loop corrections to observables grow only logarithmically (Podszus and Di Piazza 2019; Ilderton 2019), with the constant-field behavior recovered only under a condition of the form $\chi$ << a0^3 (approximate). Determine the region in the space of a0, chi and pulse phase duration in which n-loop corrections to physical observables (photon emission probability, pair yield, electron mass shift) scale as $(\alpha \chi^{2/3})^n$, and decide whether that region overlaps $\alpha \chi^{2/3} >\sim 1$ for any physically realizable background, including non-plane-wave fields such as colliding beams.
- Revision 2: The $(\alpha \chi^{2/3})^n$ loop scaling (Ritus-Narozhny conjecture) holds in an infinite constant crossed field; for finite plane-wave pulses at fixed intensity parameter $a0 = e E/(m c \omega)$ and growing particle energy, loop corrections to observables grow only logarithmically (Podszus and Di Piazza 2019; Ilderton 2019), with the constant-field behavior recovered only under a condition of the form $\chi$ $<< a0^{3}$ (approximate). Determine the region in the space of $a0, \chi$ and pulse phase duration in which n-loop corrections to physical observables (photon emission probability, pair yield, electron mass shift) scale as $(\alpha \chi^{2/3})^n$, and decide whether that region overlaps $\alpha \chi^{2/3} >\sim 1$ for any physically realizable background, including non-plane-wave fields such as colliding beams.
- Settled by
- Explicit higher-loop calculations of observables in finite pulses and in beam-beam field configurations, mapping where the power-law scaling holds.
- Kind
- well-posed
- Answer type
- classification
- References
- (empty)
- Literature status
- contested
- Status note
- Edwards and Ilderton (Phys. Rev. D, 2021) found, for inclusive observables with background-collinear degeneracies resummed to all orders in $\alpha$, an exponential rather than the conjectured power-law intensity dependence, while Di Piazza and Lopez-Lopez (2020) found vertex-correction asymptotics consistent with the conjecture.
- Posed since
- 2019
Decisions
- Accept · 2026-10-15 · record