Does the Larmor tunneling time saturate for thick barriers?
In plain words
The Hartman effect predicts that the tunneling delay stops growing as the barrier gets thicker, which would imply speeds above that of light. Cold-atom experiments that use an atom's spin as a built-in clock can now test this.
Precise statement
For cold atoms (e.g. 87Rb) tunneling through an optical barrier with an internal-state Larmor clock, measure the transmitted-atom Larmor times $\tau_y$ and $\tau_z$ versus barrier width $L$ in the opaque regime $\kappa L >> 1$, $\kappa = \sqrt{2 m (V_0 - E)} / \hbar$, and determine whether they saturate with $L$ as the Hartman effect predicts for the phase delay.
What would settle it
A Larmor-clock measurement over a range of $L$ reaching $\kappa L$ of several, with transmission high enough to resolve the precession.
Status in the literature
Larmor times of about 0.6 ms were measured for rubidium atoms in 2020, and their decrease at lower incident energy was reported in 2021 (arXiv:2101.12309).
Parent problems
- Special case of How long does a particle spend inside a tunneling barrier? · open · from revision 1
Results
No results have been posted on this problem yet.
Post a result · how results are checked
Sign in to follow or save this problem
Comments (0)
Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment.