Has an analog quench simulation exceeded classical computation?
This text mentions work from 2024 on. Those parts were partly written without a live literature search and have not been checked by an editor yet.
In plain words
A 2025 experiment claimed a quantum annealer simulated magnetic dynamics that no supercomputer could match. Classical simulation groups replied with algorithms that may do the same job.
Precise statement
Transverse-field Ising quenches on the square-lattice, dimerized-cubic, diamond-lattice and biclique spin-glass instances of King et al., Science 388, 199 (2025). Determine whether a classical algorithm reproduces the reported correlation functions to the hardware's accuracy with comparable time and energy. Answer: yes or no for each graph family studied.
What would settle it
A side-by-side benchmark of classical methods and the device on the same instances with agreed accuracy targets.
Status in the literature
Unverified note: it names recent work and was partly written without a live literature search; it awaits a check by an editor.
Belief-propagation tensor networks (Tindall et al., Science 2026) and time-dependent variational Monte Carlo (Mauron and Carleo, arXiv:2503.08247) disputed the claim, and a 2026 comment argued neural quantum states are competitive on some instances.
Results
No results have been posted on this problem yet.
Post a result · how results are checked
Sign in to follow or save this problem
See also
- Related A classically hard equilibrium observable an analog simulator can reach
- Related A scalable protocol to certify analog simulator outputs
- Related Polynomial-cost real-time simulation of interacting fermion lattices
- Related Is the 2025 OTOC(2) quantum echo experiment beyond classical simulation?
Comments (0)
Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment.