What binds electron pairs in magic-angle graphene superconductors?

In plain words

Superconductivity needs electrons to pair up despite repelling each other, and in magic-angle graphene it is unknown whether lattice vibrations (phonons) or the electrons' own interactions supply the attraction.

Precise statement

Twisted bilayer graphene at $\theta \sim 1.05-1.15\,\mathrm{deg}$ superconducts with $T_c$ up to $\sim 3\,\mathrm{K}$ near filling $\nu = -2 - \delta$ ($\nu$ = electrons per moire cell measured from charge neutrality). Determine the dominant pairing interaction (intervalley K-point optical phonons, other phonons, spin or valley fluctuations, Coulomb-driven Kohn-Luttinger pairing, or a combination) and the order-parameter symmetry. An answer is a microscopic model that reproduces the measured $T_c(\nu, \theta)$, tunnelling gap spectrum and superfluid stiffness without retuned parameters.

What would settle it

A phase-sensitive gap-symmetry measurement plus an isotope or phonon-engineering test, combined with a parameter-free calculation reproducing $T_{c}(\nu, \theta)$.

Status in the literature

Unverified note: it names recent work and was partly written without a live literature search; it awaits a check by an editor.

2024 photoemission (Chen et al., Nature 636, 342) found flat-band replicas from strong coupling to a $\sim 150\,\mathrm{meV}$ K-point phonon, while 2025 superfluid-stiffness data show power-law temperature dependence pointing to unconventional pairing; no consensus as of 2026.

Problems built on this one

Special cases

Revision history

Results

No results have been posted on this problem yet.

Post a result · how results are checked

Sign in to follow or save this problem

See also

Comments (0)

Comments are not records: they are not signed, stamped or logged. How comments work

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment.